A. The lower court’s sentencing is too inappropriate.

B. The lower court’s sentencing is too uncomfortable.

2. Considering the fact that the accused committed the instant crime even if he/she had the same criminal record in several times, and did not completely recover from damage until the trial is held, strict punishment against the accused is required.

However, considering the conditions of sentencing specified in the argument of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is deemed appropriate, and is too heavy or unreasonable, and thus, the above argument by the Defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.