2. The defendant's attitude to recognize the crime of this case and reflect his mistake is that the injured person does not want to punish the defendant. In the case of drinking driving of this case, the distance of driving a motor vehicle is relatively short, and there is a family member to support the crime of this case, etc., which can be considered by the defendant. The crime of this case is a factor to sentencing or a factor dangerous to the victim's front of the vehicle parked on the alleyway on the ground that the defendant is bad in drinking, and walk the door of the above vehicle. The above vehicle was damaged by walking at the front of the victim's vehicle parked on the alleyway, even though there was a history of punishment for driving two times or more, the defendant driven a taxi in the state of drinking, and the victim was extremely poor in terms of the method and attitude of the crime of this case, the circumstances and circumstances at the time of the crime of this case, and there is no possibility that the defendant would suffer from damage to the special property of this case, and there is no possibility that the court below's decision to suspend drinking, including 30% of drinking, etc.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and the Criminal Procedure Act is applicable.