When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

From March 1, 2016 to May 30, 2016, the Defendant: (a) leased “D” of “D” located in Isan City from around March 1, 2016 to around May 30, 2016, and (b) leased KRW 50 million to the victim E; and (c) leased the Plaintiff’s name bank account (F) for the operation of the said telecom.

On January 2, 2017, the Defendant changed the password of the above Suhyup Account in the name of the Defendant and prevented the victim from withdrawing accommodation expenses, etc. deposited into the above account on the ground that the victim did not pay the car at the present point of Ansan-si, Ansan-si, Masan-si, the Sinsan-si, and the victim did not return the said telecom.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70 (1) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;