2. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) is KRW 11,871,836 to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

1. Facts of recognition;

가. 피고는 2014. 4. 29. 서울 용산구 C아파트 103동 1404호(이하 ‘이 사건 아파트’라 한다)의 소유권을 취득한 다음 위 아파트에 입주하기 전에 인테리어공사를 시행하기 위하여, 2014. 5. 22. 원고에게 위 아파트의 가설, 철거, 발코니 확장, 샷시, 벽체몰딩천정 등 목공사, 확장부분 전기공사, 도장, 도배, 바닥, 도어필름 등의 인테리어 공사(이하 ‘이 사건 공사’라 한다)를 공사대금 40,000,000원에 도급주기로 하는 내용의 공사계약을 구두로 체결하였다.

On June 2, 2014, the Defendant entered into a contract under which the design is modified to increase the construction cost as KRW 64,00,000,000, and entered into a contract under which the design is re-converted on June 3, 2014, thereby increasing the construction cost as KRW 75,027,590.

(hereinafter “instant construction contract”). B.

On June 2, 2014, the Defendant paid KRW 30,000,000 to the Plaintiff as advance payment.

C. While the Plaintiff was running the instant construction project, the Defendant’s husband D (hereinafter “foreign husband”) began to intervene in the said construction project, and the Defendant notified the Plaintiff on June 23, 2014 that the instant construction contract will be terminated on the ground of the Plaintiff’s defective construction, and the Plaintiff did not enter the said construction site without suspending the said construction project.

원고는 2014. 6. 23. 기준으로 이 사건 공사 중 아파트 전체 가설철거공사, 발코니확장공사 중 미장, 난방 등 설비 및 바닥공사, 미장공사, 샷시, 화장실 철거공사를 시행하였으며, 나머지 공사는 소외인이 직영으로 진행하였다.

[Grounds for Recognition: Evidence Nos. 1, 7, Eul Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings]

2. Determination on the main claim

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion by the parties is ① from May 14, 2014 to June 29, 2014 at the construction site of the instant case.