beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.05.21 2013고단4733

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등폭행)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three years and six months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, a public prosecution against C is instituted.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 15, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and six months in Daejeon District Court on December 15, 201, with prison labor for the purpose of attempted fire-prevention, etc., and on April 29, 2013, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence.

1. Interference with business;

A. On May 20, 2013, the Defendant: (a) from around 00:30 to around 02:25 on May 20, 2013, 2013, the Defendant: (b) demanded that “act” be flowed within the F main point operated by the victim E (the age of 66) in the West-gu, Seo-gu; and (c) demanded that the Defendant fright and reject the Defendant’s drinking, even before the said victim talked about the drinking, the Defendant frighted about the drinking, and had the Defendant refund the drinking water to two customers by taking advantage of the drinking water.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

B. On June 2, 2013, from around 01:10 to around 01:30 of the same day, the Defendant sought the victim from the above F main points from June 2, 2013 to from around 01:30 of the same day, and continued to take the victim’s “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

C. On July 5, 2013, the Defendant, who interfered with the business of July 5, 2013, was drunk from around 10:30 to 13:25, on July 5, 2013, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol within an I cafeteria operated by the Victim H (n, the age of 71) in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul, and continued to talk with the victim “a person who is aware of the visitors, the openings,” and had the victim talked that the victim would not take a bath.