2. The reason why the judgment is against the instant crime is to be taken into account.

However, in light of the fact that the Defendant had been punished for the same crime, including the punishment imposed by the same kind of crime, the Defendant had a history of driving the instant drinking and non-licenseing without a license, and that he/she did not subscribe to the mandatory motor vehicle insurance, and other various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.