A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and for four months, respectively.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

1. Defendant A

A. On January 8, 2010, the Defendant testified that “I would like to know how I would have complied with what I would at that time? I would like to answer? I would like to answer the question in question, “I would like to know how I would like to go to you? I would like to go to you? I would like to go to you? I would like to go to you? I would like to go to you? I would like to go to you? I would like to go to you? I would like to go to you? I would like to go to go to you? I would like to go to you would like to go to you you would go to you you would go to you you would go to.? I would like to go to go to you at the same place when I w was sealed by the witness at the bar of the defense counsel G.”

However, in the process of unilaterally assaulting a defendant, E is only a defense to the extent that it is to cover up the part of the defendant in a last time, and there is no time of drinking the defendant, and H and I witness a assault case at the site of H and I at the time.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

B. On June 11, 2010, the Defendant testified at the Gwangju District Court court located in the Dong-gu, Gwangju, Dong-gu, Gwangju, that he was present and declared a witness for the injury case No. 2010No403, the above court. Of his defense counsel's inquiry, the Defendant testified that "I would like to answer the question that "I would like to be why you would suffer from dynasium." While the Defendant was aware, I would like to see that I would have "I would like to dynasium?" while bring flap, I would like to dynasium, and I would like to see that "I would like to dynasium?" and "I would like to dynasium? I would like to answer the two questions of "I would like to dynasium?" and I would like to answer the questions of "I would like to synasium?" among the presiding judge's questions in the above case.

Now, first, we met the threshold.