도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.
Where the defendant does not pay the above fine, only 10 days shall be the day.
Punishment of the crime
On December 25, 2013, at around 22:45, the Defendant driven H QM5 vehicles at the 1km section from the front side of the G cafeteria located in the G-si F to the 26th street lamps located in the same Ri, in the state of 0.104% of blood alcohol concentration.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Legal statement of a witness I;
1. Statement of each police statement to I and J;
1. The following circumstances acknowledged by the aforementioned evidence, namely, ① the article J of the towing vehicle in a neutral position stated by the police that “the Defendant was under influence of alcohol at the time of the accident,” and ② the Defendant stated that “the Defendant was at the location of the Defendant who was under the influence of alcohol at the time of the accident since he was covered by a comprehensive automobile insurance policy,” and the Defendant stated that “the Defendant would cause the police officer to drive alcohol at the time of the accident” as the Defendant was under the influence of the Defendant at the police box. The Defendant escaped from the police box, who was a public official, in the process of making a speech and telephone conversations, is an act difficult to understand on the premise that the Defendant was not under the influence of alcohol, and ③ the Defendant did not make a statement that “the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the time of the accident,” and the Defendant did not make a statement that “after the accident, the police officer was under the influence of alcohol at the time of the accident,” and then asked the police box to “after the arrival of alcohol again after making a statement.”
The part of the Defendant’s “drinking alcohol after an accident” is a key issue before the measurement of alcohol, and the circumstance that there was a police officer and a trial room is never peeped.
In light of the fact that the Defendant did not present an alcoholic beverage as evidence, the credibility of the Defendant’s statement that “the drinking alcohol after an accident” is a question.