A Imprisonment for one year, Defendant B, and D shall be sentenced to six months of imprisonment, Defendant C, E, F, and G respectively.

Defendant

A All branches of the J Headquarters K branch (hereinafter referred to as the “L branch”), Defendant B, C, D, E, F, and G are the environmental supervisors belonging to the said branch.

The Defendants knew that they discharge and incinerate wastes in violation of the relevant laws, such as the Wastes Control Act, at the Scheon-si, Paju-si, and Sayang-si, in which the zero-gu factories are densely located, and tried to detect illegal acts in the furniture factories and to file a complaint with the competent authorities, and to raise money under the pretext of donation on the condition that they did not file a charge against the operator of the furniture factories at the time of donation in the above L branch.

1. Around March 23, 2012, Defendant A’s sole criminal defendant committed a crime with a 600,000 won, receiving KRW 60,00,00 from the victim, who was frighted, to the agricultural bank account in the name of the JP branch, under the name of the JP branch, under the pretext of membership joining the said L branch, and transferred KRW 60,000 to the agricultural bank account in the name of the JP branch, under the pretext of membership joining the said L branch.

2. Defendants A and F’s co-principal Defendants jointly committed the following acts: around 11:30 on April 2, 2012; Defendant A and F’s co-principaled Defendants jointly committed the following acts: (a) in the TM manufacturing factory of the victim S in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Ilyang-si, with an environmental supervisor certificate attached; (b) Defendant F: (c) stamped the photographs of the facilities in the factory; and (d) Defendant A pointed out the incineration of the factory inside the factory; and (c) Defendant A, stating that “When the factory is operated, a fine would be imposed, no accusation would be filed; and (d) the donations should be filed with the competent authority without making any contribution in the said L branch, and the said Defendants’ co-principaled the same attitude from the victim to the agricultural bank account in the name of the JP branch under the pretext of donation.