On December 12, 2014, around 03:55, the Defendant asked the victim E, an employee, to receive money from using the account of the victim's head of the Tong at Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, to collect money from him/her, and let him/her go to the door room where the victim had been released, and let him/her enter the door room with his/her own windows while entering the door room with the victim, and let him/her fished with a cash amounting to 1.3 million won in cash owned by the victim, two passbooks, one credit card, one physical card, and one sheet.

As a result, the Defendant intruded into the above Domoter room, and stolen a bank equivalent to KRW 1,300,000 owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 330 of the Criminal Act in relation to the criminal facts [the scope of recommending punishment] of the punishment under Article 330 of the Criminal Act in general property, where the mitigated area (eight to one month and one year and six months) (special mitigation) [the decision of sentencing] of the mitigated area (eight to one year and six months) and intrudes into places other than indoor residential space [the decision of sentence] of the crime in this case despite multiple criminal records, despite multiple criminal records, the fact that the crime in this case was committed again again in spite of multiple kinds of crime records, unfavorable circumstances such as the fact that a person has the same criminal records, deposit KRW 1.5 million for victims, and reflect