2. There is no significant change in circumstances that may be considered in sentencing favorable to the defendant after the judgment of the court below.

In light of the following: (a) the Defendant was sentenced to five years of imprisonment for the crime of attempted murder in 2000; (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime despite the fact that he had a number of same records; and (c) the Defendant began to commit a series of crimes against the victim D during the period when he was investigated as a crime against the victim B; and (d) the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant records and pleadings and the reasons for sentencing of the lower judgment, even if considering the circumstances required by the Defendant, it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the conclusion is groundless.