상해
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, although the court below acquitted the defendant of the facts that the defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim's hand, the court below found the defendant not guilty. The court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles as to the mistake of facts, credibility of evidence, and legitimate act, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.
2. Determination
A. The judgment of the court below is that evidence that corresponds to the fact that the defendant was injured by the victim by taking the victim's fingers as stated in the facts charged of this case is the only statement in the victim's investigative agency and in the court of the court below. On April 25, 2018, the victim classified the victim's fingers to the police dispatched at the time of this case as losses, and when the defendant makes a statement at the police on May 5, 2018, he stated that his fingers were plicked and plicked by the defendant, and the defendant was present at the court of the court of the court below and first, that "the defendant was faced by the defendant while making a ditch not only at the time but also at the time," and again, the prosecutor's repeated questioning "It is difficult to see that the defendant's act was against the victim's Articles and knicks in the process of making it difficult to see that the defendant's act was against the victim's fingers."