If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On November 4, 2017, at around 16:43, the Defendant returned to the police officer after receiving a report on the food value at the “D” restaurant located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, and the Defendant brought a dispute to his employees and her bath, and demanded other customers to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able

The Defendant was found to be the above D restaurant operated by the victim from 17:07 to 18:00 on the same day, and “I have reported”;

The victim interfered with the business affairs of the restaurant operated by the victim for about one hour, such as making it difficult for customers who want to enter the restaurant by leaving the cafeteria, such as "the death, the death, the free window broken away", and making it difficult for them to enter the cafeteria.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Each statement of E and F;

1. Application of the 112 Reporting List, investigation report (on-site CCTV confirmation)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions for facts constituting an offense, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment, and selection of fines (such as: (i) the fact that the accused is erroneous, the fact that the victim does not want punishment, and the fact that the victim does not exercise direct tangible power, etc.);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;