beta
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2016.10.20 2016가단4872

손해배상 청구

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion was supplied with a finished product from the Defendant to B (hereinafter “non-party company”) out of the parts that were first consumed in elevator bloet. As the Defendant supplied a V less than the ordered quantity, the Plaintiff suffered damages equivalent to KRW 20,653,728 from the non-party company due to the decline in the Plaintiff’s credit rating in the non-party company due to a significant decrease in the ordered volume of bloet in February and March 2016. The Plaintiff purchased finished product from the Defendant and supplied the above non-party company with a V finished product, thereby gaining profits equivalent to KRW 9,136,720 per annum. However, the Plaintiff suffered damages equivalent to the above amount due to the Plaintiff’s notice of change in the delivery customer from February 2, 2016.

2. The Defendant supplied goods less than the ordered quantity only on the basis of each description and image of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, and evidence Nos. 7 (including each number)

It is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff’s sales, etc. of the Nonparty Company have decreased due to such decrease, and there is no other objective evidence to acknowledge this otherwise, and the Plaintiff’s assertion is rejected without need to further determine.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.