beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.11.29 2018고단2104

상해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2018 Highest 2104]

1. On August 16, 2018, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the said car in a manner that, while crossing the road under the influence of alcohol on the street front of the convenience store No. 101 E, the Defendant destroyed the said car in a manner that: (b) discovered the Fluent car of the victim C’s operation; and (c) by walking the said car even with the driver’s seat door, the amount of KRW 600,000 for the repair cost would be equal to 60,000 for the said car.

2. On August 16, 2018, at around 20:55, the Defendant: (a) ordered the Victim G (V, 19 years of age) who was part-time in the E convenience store as set forth in paragraph (1) of this Article, to give tobacco to the victim G (V) who was part-time in the E convenience store; and (b) caused the damage of the mobile phone owned by the victim to have the victim collected things, such as a log, tobacco, etc. on the part of the victim, and caused the damage of the mobile phone so that the cost of repair is 305,100 won or more.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the cell phone of the victim and interfered with the convenience store business of the victim about 10 minutes by force.

3. On August 16, 2018, the Defendant injured the Victim H, while drunk at the E convenience store as indicated in paragraph (1) around August 21, 2018, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the Victim H (49 years of age) by drinking the victim’s face 3-4 times due to the Victim H (49 years of age).

4. On August 16, 2018, around 21:08, the Defendant: (a) took part in the scene after receiving a report from 112 in front of the E convenience store as set forth in paragraph (1) of this Article; (b) the victim J (26 years old) who is the police officer belonging to the police station I police station of the father, took a bath to the Defendant; and (c) took part in the victim’s crypology with her head, she took part in the victim’s crypology for treatment for seven days; and (d) took part in the victim’s crypology, gambling, check, etc.

As a result, the defendant interferes with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of reported cases, and simultaneously interferes with the victim.