A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

1. Defendant A

A. On May 15, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the victim F’s breast part of the victim F, who f, who f, f, was fright to drink at the main point of “D” located in Busan-gun C, Busan-gun, due to drinking value, and was assaulted by a bridge.

B. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the above date, time, place, and the police officer G who was dispatched after receiving a 112 report while assaulting F at the above time and place, prevented the police officer G, thereby putting the shoulder part of the above G on several occasions, and the police officer’s shoulder part of H was frighted to drinking.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. On May 15, 2017, Defendant B, at the main point of “D” located in the Busan District captain C around 00:10 on May 15, 2017, after drinking alcohol with Defendant C, Defendant G, the police officer of the Defendant, who was sent to the police station, after receiving a report of 112 due to the issue of the business owner and the drinking value, stated that “the drinking value would have been paid due to the late time and the time would have been returned to the police officer,” and that Defendant B, the main place of business owner, etc. was heard by the victim, who was the victim, who was “Ya Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma

G. At least five years before the opening, the police officers of the I District are found to have off clothes.

We also see that we will do so.

In addition, the victim publicly insultingd the victim by referring “h.”.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to F, G, H, and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts;

(a) Defendant A: Article 136(1) of each Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence);

B. Defendant B: Article 311 of the Criminal Act

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the commercial concurrence (defendant A);

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes (defendant A), the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the criminal orders for provisional payment, is the liquor value at the main point.