명예훼손
The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.
1. After September 2014, the Defendant: (a) heard that F was unable to borrow and receive money from the victim G at the trade name office “E” operated by Daejeon Jung-gu Ctel 1522 around September 2014; and (b) sought from F, “G is in accordance with H as H is short of the letter; and (c) obtained money from the victim; (d) by pointing out false facts that “G is receiving money at the time of money,” thereby impairing the victim G’s reputation.
2. Determination
A. The petitioner of this case is G, and H only stated that “G was able to see and obtain money with H as it did not go with H,” and that she was aware that she did so.
There are some statements in F's legal statement, police's statement about F's statement, and police's statement about D's statement for the following reasons, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge the facts charged of this case.
1) From this Court, F stated that there was no G at the place indicated in the facts charged, and there was D. However, the Defendant stated that “G was able to talk that “G lent money to its branch” and that it was unable to talk with the Defendant that it was done by receiving the money or obtained the money. However, F made a statement on December 6, 2014, when she called with G on the phone on the phone of December 6, 2014, that “F would use the money for H. I.S. I.S. I.S. I.S. I.S. I.S. W.S. I.S. I.S. am with two voices of “I.S. I.S. I.S. I.S. I.S. I.S. I.S. I.S. I.S.S. am. I.S. I.F.S.S.W.E.S.S.E.S.E.W will use the money for H. I.S.S.S.S.S.S.