except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 13, 2019, around 02:35, the Defendant: (a) reported 112 on the street in front of the “C Child Care Center” located in Nam-gu, Nam-gu; and (b) reported 112, the victim E, a police officer belonging to the Gyeongbuk-gu Police Station D District, who called the scene, solicited the Defendant to return home; (c) subsequently, the victim E, a police officer belonging to the Gyeongbuk-gu Police Station D District, recommended the Defendant to return home; (d) the above E’s right-hand buckbbucks were cut back one time; and (e) assaulted the victim F face, a police officer belonging to the same district unit, called

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in regard to the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the list of reported crimes, such as photographs of damage, violence reporting cases, moving to a site, details of arrest of flagrant offenders, etc., place of work and 112

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the defendant acknowledges the error);