On March 26, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million for larceny, etc. from the Youngju District Court’s Young-dong branch on March 26, 2015; on March 18, 2015, the Cheongju District Court was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1 million for larceny; on January 7, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a punishment of KRW 1 million for habitual larceny, etc. at the Daegu District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on October 30, 2016.

On January 23, 2017, the Defendant used a computer by pretending to be a customer in the “D” room located in Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu as of January 23, 2017, and 450,000 won in cash, which was entered in a simplified credit cooperative in the location of the victim E by making use of the gap in cleaning.

L. A. L. theft was committed.

In addition, the Defendant, from that time until February 15, 2017, attempted to steal or steal money and valuables worth KRW 4,875,000 in total in the same way, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table, from that time until February 15, 2017, in a total of 18 times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of each protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement of each police statement with respect to F, G, H, and I;

1. Each on-site photograph, each on-site identification report, each on-site identification report, internal investigation report (the “Africa TV screen and AD verification”), internal investigation report (the addition of a suspect’s fTV screen image on the theft site), investigation report, the results of the appraisal, each CCTV photograph, the records of seizure and seizure, the list of seized objects, photographs of each site identification, the results of the inquiry into personal information of the detained suspect DNA, as a result of the on-site photograph, CCTV photograph, CCTV photograph, the on-site identification photograph, the notification of the results of the on-site fingerprint identification, the request for an on-site fingerprint appraisal, and the descriptions or images of the results thereof;

1. Previous records of judgment: Each statement of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal records, written investigation reports (of the same type of criminal records, attachment of the judgment, and period of repeated crimes);

1. Habituality of the judgment: The application of the law to recognize the dampness in light of the records of each crime, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the repeated crimes of the same kind in the judgment, etc.