On April 12, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and three years of probation at the Seoul Northern District Court on April 12, 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 20, 201, and is still subject to the said grace period. On March 29, 2010, the same court issued a fine of one million won for larceny, and on June 27, 2011, notified each of the summary orders of KRW 500,000 to be sentenced to larceny.

1. At around 00:30 on April 30, 2013, the Defendant discovered the victim C’s Kafa car parked at the third floor parking lot of Samsung-Lease apartment underground located in 4, 843, Jung-gu, Seoul, Seoul, into the key hole of the said car, put the locking device into the driver’s seat hole of the said car, and cut off the locking device at a rate of 80,000 won per the victim’s market value owned by the said car.

2. On May 9, 2013: (a) around 03:10, the Defendant: (b) discovered and prepared a F Kanman car in front of 1002 apartment complex 10-dong, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, at the 1066-dong, in front of the 1002 parking lot; (c) found the F Kanman car in front of the 1002 apartment complex; (d) sought money and valuables by sticking the car in front of the 10-dong parking lot; (e) cutting off the car in front of the 10-dong, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, and then, (e) throw the lock-out device under the above below; and (e) tried to steal money and valuables by driving the

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen or attempted to steals another person's money and valuables.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. C’s statement;

1. Previous records: Criminal records and investigation reports (report on confirmation of the previous records and results of confirmation, and attachment of written judgments);

1. Habitualness of judgment: Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes that recognize dampness in light of the records of each crime and the method of the commission of crimes, etc. as stated in the judgment;