In order to order the provisional payment of an amount equivalent to the above fine.

On August 15, 2012, the Defendant, a corporation for trucking transport business, etc., and B, an employee of the Defendant, operated the 4 axis to the above vehicles at the fixed string of the above 14.29 tons at the time of the first inspection and 8.64 tons at the time of the second inspection, thereby obstructing the measurement of the load load of vehicles.

Accordingly, the above B, who is the employee of the defendant, committed the above violation in relation to the defendant's business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on detection of vehicles violating restrictions on the operation of motorways;

1. Subparagraph 1 of Article 100 of the Road Act, Article 97 subparagraph 9 of the same Act, and subparagraph 1 of Article 60 of the same Act on criminal facts;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;