When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On October 7, 2015, at around 20:00, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by avoiding disturbance for about 20 minutes, and allowing customers to go out of the restaurant, such as having customers go out of the restaurant, in the D restaurant operated by the victim C (29 tax) located in the Geum-gu Busan (29).

2. 모욕 피고인은 2015. 10. 7. 20:53 경 위 식당에서 피해자 C로부터 ‘ 계산을 해 달라’ 는 말을 듣자 화를 내며 그 곳 성명 불상의 손님들 12명 등이 듣고 있는 자리에서 피해자에게 “ 씨 발 놈 아. 개새끼야, 장사 좀 된다고 손님한테 똥배짱 부리나 ”라고 큰소리로 말하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;