However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 20, 2014, at around 07:59, the Defendant: (a) brought an injury on the part of the victim E, a waitter, who is a waitter, in Gangnam-gu Seoul, on the ground that he continuously demands the drinking value; and (b) brought an injury to the victim, such as the stude of a vegetable wall, which is a dangerous object on the table table, while making it called “I Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A medical certificate;

1. A damaged photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Evidence records 38 pages);

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of inflicting an injury on a dangerous object);

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Social Service Order [Scope of Recommendation] : (a) the mitigated area (one year and six months through two years and six months) (one year and six months) of the mitigated area (a year and six months), minor bodily injury (a person who has a special mitigation]; (b) the degree of damage of this case; (c) the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for the same crime in 2010; (d) the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for the same crime in 2010; (e) the fact that there was a history of being punished 19 times for the same crime; and (e) the victim was not punished. It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.