A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

1. Defendant A

A. On May 15, 2016, around 07:00, the Defendant stolen the victim’s gallon 5’s “gallon 5” carrying gallon, which is equivalent to KRW 500,000, in the market value of the victim’s ownership, located adjacent to the victim, using the gallon d in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

The defendant, including this, from around that time, is the same year.

5. Until March 31, 200, a total of 10 times together with 10 mobile phones equivalent to the market price of 3,575,000 won owned by the victims, such as the attached list 1 in the list of crimes.

B. On May 22, 2016, the Defendant used a computer, etc.: (a) connected the game plos case using a stolen mobile phone owned by the I and then charged with the game machine amounting to KRW 25,000, in the said mobile phone case at HPC room located in Bupyeong-gu, Seocheon-si; and (b) connected the game machine in the said mobile phone case at least 25,000, as indicated in the List of Crimes No. 142, Mar. 22, 2016.

By entering the I’s resident registration number and Hand phone number in the mobile small payment system operated by the victim Co., Ltd., the victim Co., Ltd., and inputting the certification number transmitted from the victim Co., Ltd. to the above I’s mobile phone again into the certification number column of the above I’s mobile phone payment system, the payment for the above game money was made.

In addition, from around that time to 13:05 of the same day, the Defendant settled the total amount of KRW 1,060,000, such as game money, cultural merchandise coupons, etc., over 34 times in total, as shown in the attached list 2 of crimes committed.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired financial benefits equivalent to 1,060,000 won by inputting information into a computer or any other information processing device without authority.

2. On April 2016, Defendant B, who was aware of the comments posted on the Internet job-seeking site by Defendant B, was a mobile phone purchaser of an irregular stolen cell phone with the name of J, i.e., giving money.