However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 19, 2014, the Defendant: (a) sentenced two years and six months to imprisonment at the Seoul Central District Court; (b) sentenced to one year imprisonment at the Seoul Central District Court on March 4, 2015; (c) decided December 20, 2013; (d) decided December 23, 2013; (b) decided July 20, 2016 at the Incheon Central District Court sentenced to six years and ten; (c) decided July 28, 2016; (d) died on August 16, 2014; and (e) released money from the Seoul Central District Court as if he/she were to immediately use the money to transfer the money to a corporation and submit the balance of the money as if he/she were to obtain the necessary proof of the balance of the money to be immediately transferred from the deposit account to the Seoul Central District Court; and (e) decided on February 12, 2013; and (e) decided on April 18, 2012.

Accordingly, C, D, and E will engage in the business of establishing a corporation or certifying balance of deposits as a corporate representative director, and the president and the head of the Tong necessary for committing the crime to withdraw the money obtained by opening the passbook necessary for the crime, and the defendant will act as the corporate representative director, and F, G, and H will act as the withdrawal of the money obtained by opening the passbook necessary for committing the crime.

On December 30, 2009, the Defendant stated, with C, etc., that “Around December 12:30, 2009, the Defendant deposited KRW 300 million on the one day of the head of the Tong, as it is necessary to prove the balance of the head of the Tong amounting to KRW 300 million during a day to establish a corporation,” with the victim M&N operated by the victim L at the J Kerc shop located in Seoul Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.”

However, even if the injured party deposits KRW 300 million into the defendant's account for the certification of balance of deposits, the defendant et al. was merely attempted to immediately withdraw and divide it as above, and did not intend to return it to the victim after using it as a certificate of balance of deposits.

The Defendant, in collusion with C, etc., is as above.