The defendant is a person who resides in Ulsan-gun Down-gun, and is a member of the owner and the representative of the executor, and the victim E(42) is the operator of the executory company.

피고인은 평소 피해 자가 위 빌라 공사대금을 모두 지급 받았음에도 건축주에게 추가 공사대금을 요구한다고 생각하여 불만을 갖고 있던 중, 2018. 3. 2. 16:49 경 위 빌라 1 층 주차장에서 미지급 공사대금 문제를 해결하기 위해 찾아온 피해자를 발견하자 피해자에게 욕설을 하며 오른발로 피해자의 복부를 1회 걷어차고, 왼발로 피해자의 정강이를 1회 걷어찼다.

After taking three times the face of the victim's face in drinking, the defendant continued to take the victim's head debt into two knee and knee in two times the victim's face, and then the victim's knee and knee in drinking once a week, the victim's knee and kne in drinking two times the victim's head.

As a result, the Defendant suffered bodily injury, such as cutting off two cage cages which require treatment for about 56 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Statement of E in the protocol of interrogation of the suspect against the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each investigation report (the sequence 5, 34, 36 of the evidence list);

1. Each injury diagnosis certificate (Evidence record 26,312 pages);

1. Application of CCTV video CDs (Evidence Nos. 6)-related statutes;

1. The reason for sentencing [the scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines] under Article 257(1) of the Act on the Punishment of Specific Crimes and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Code on the Selection of the Punishment of Specific Crimes (the scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines] under Article 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Specific Injury (the general injury) (the period between June and February 6): the serious injury (the type 1, 4) [the decision of sentence] under Article 4 of the Act on the Punishment of Specific Crimes of this case (the decision of sentence] The defendant was punished for dispute with the defendant's will due to the settlement of construction cost of this case Dora, etc.