The Defendant, as the owner of C (SM3), did not subscribe to mandatory insurance under Article 5 (Obligation to Purchase Insurance, etc.) of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act, but violated the provisions of Article 8 (Prohibition of Driving) of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act by operating the said vehicle at the next location.

A C D 2015-07-11 01:09 Dongdaemun-gu 2C D 2015-05-31 05:17, located in Dongdaemun-gu, the summary of the evidence of the front of the road of Sejong University located in the Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong 4 C AD 2015-04-20 01:28, located in the Highway 310.8m (b) located in the Highway 33 AD 2015-02-10:14, Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong 405.

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inspection of the motor vehicle registration ledger (A);

1. Compulsory insurance contract;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries about non-insurance operating vehicles;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Article 46 (2) 2 and Article 8 of the Guarantee of Compensation for Damages Caused by Motor Vehicles and Selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. A fine not exceeding 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Pronouncement is against the Defendant’s depth at the time of committing the instant crime.

The special judicial police officer who investigated the defendant also wanted to take the defendant against the defendant.

The defendant has been dedicated to his studies in good faith while attending a university.

around 2015, the Defendant was notified of summary order for the same crime as the instant case, and the instant case also was punished as such.

state was the situation that should have been.

The defendant is operating a vehicle that he has purchased mandatory insurance after.

The defendant is in a situation in which he should graduate from Korea, and when he is punished by a fine, he is faced with a crisis that will be forced to leave Korea, and is harsh as a punishment for the crime of this case.

There are various circumstances, such as the defendant's age, sex, motive for the crime, and circumstances after the crime.