A. On September 8, 2016, the Plaintiff and the Defendant: (a) on the ground of the CJ 3305 square meters (hereinafter “instant real estate”); and (b) on the ground of the CJ 3305 square meters (hereinafter “instant real estate”); (c) “the instant project” is “the instant project.

'The consulting service contract (hereinafter referred to as 'the instant service contract') to operate the consulting service contract.

B) Around June 7, 2017, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant that the instant service contract will be terminated because the Defendant did not comply with the Plaintiff’s requirements. (c) The Defendant, upon the Defendant’s request, filed an application for the provisional seizure of ownership transfer registration against the Defendant’s third party obligor E with the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2017Kadan80739 as to the right to claim damages against the Plaintiff and the right to claim loans, and filed an application for the provisional seizure of ownership transfer registration with the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2017Kadan80739 as to the right to claim damages against the Defendant’s third party obligor E, and the instant provisional seizure order was issued by the said court on July 13, 2017. The Plaintiff’s objection was defective, and the said court approved the provisional seizure order 70 million won on August 23, 2017 against the Defendant’s third party obligor E with the deposit order of KRW 500 million on the provisional seizure order as the above Seoul Central District Court Decision 20175.75.75