Examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court, it is justifiable to have determined that the lower court found the Defendant guilty of violating the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. due to possession of phiphones among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

There is no error of exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or of misapprehending the relevant legal principles.

In addition, the court below's rejection of the defendant's allegation on the defendant's mental health or mental health or injury, based on the circumstances as stated in its reasoning.

In addition, there is no error of misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles concerning mental disorder or mental disability.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.