However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for one year.

At around 01:30 on April 12, 2014, the Defendants: (a) released the victim’s face from Empt Ba in Jeju City D on the ground that the victim F (17 years of age) expressed the victim’s desire to take a phone to the female-friendly room of Defendant A; and (b) Defendant A her walked the victim’s face at hand while walking the victim’s buckbuck, and Defendant B also took the victim’s face with his hand.

As a result, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victims, thereby causing injury to the victims, such as the cutting of a peltos and the closure of a peltos in need of treatment for about five weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. and Article 2 (2) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the defendants who choose to commit a crime;

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the community service order: The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommendation] general injury (the general injury) is no basic area (the person who is a special person) (the decision of sentence): The degree of injury to the victim is relatively heavy, and favorable circumstances such as the fact that the victim’s quality is not good: all the Defendants are the initial offenders, each of the 2.5 million won for the victim, and each of the 2.5 million won for the victim is reflected, and the Defendants’ age, etc. are considered to be sentenced to the same sentence as the order.