공무집행방해등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Criminal facts
1. On June 12, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, while being examined as a assault case with D by a police box located in Ansan-si Party B, Ansan-si, A, the Defendant spited, spiting, spit, and spit, E, a patroler affiliated with the police box where he was sittinged into the atmosphere and spit, spit, etc.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in criminal investigations.
2. From June 12, 2016 to 05:00 on June 12, 2016, the Defendant, on the grounds that, at the F of the Police Station of the Nansan Group located in Ansan-ro, the Defendant: (a) from around 01:05 to around 05:0, G and H, etc., he sent his lock to the house without releasing his lock; and (b) G and H et al., the police station of the Nansan member on duty and the police officer belonging to the police station of the Kansan-gu group; (c) 1 being towed if he is equal to the bit of a bitch, even if the bitch is equal to the bitch of a bitch; (d) the son, the son, the son, the son, the son, the son, the son, the son, the son, the son, the son, the son, the son, the son, and the son.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made to I by the police;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written E;
1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of public duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) has not yet been reinstated, but considering the confession and reflect of the defendant, the fact that the defendant is the primary offender, etc
1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Protection, Observation, etc. of Social Service Order.