However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On March 27, 2015, around 19:50 on March 27, 2015, the Defendant: (a) dumped B’s ebbbbbbbage, flaps, and flapeded B’s flaps at the parking lot for the central resting area located in the 50-do Incheon-gun, Gangwon-do, and reported on the 112 report; and (b) flabeded from D to the police officer affiliated with the police box of the Gangwon Police Station, and (c) flabeded

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the prevention and investigation of crimes.

2. On March 27, 2015, the Defendant, at the police box of Gangwon-do, arrested as a flagrant offender in the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties at the police box located in Incheon-do, as described in the above paragraph (1), and threatened the assistantF belonging to the above C police box, with the view of “scambling, sprinking, sprinking, and sprinking,” and under investigation.

이에 경사 F이 피고인에게 수갑을 채우자 피고인은 이에 화가 나 발로 위 F의 왼쪽 허벅지를 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on criminal investigations.

3. On March 27, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was investigated by the above C police box on charges of obstruction of the performance of official duties, as stated in the above paragraphs 1 and 2; (b) was sent to the police box at the request of the family members who found the Defendant; and (c) was sent to the said patrol officer, who was on the front of the entrance of the above C police box, and carried to the said patrol officer, who was in contact with his family members, and carried to the said patrol officer, who was on the front of the entrance of the above C police box, and carried out an assault, such as cutting

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to D, F, and B;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The crimes under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, which are committed in the state of detention, are committed by the defendant, and there is no record that the defendant has committed the same crimes.