2. The judgment of the court below is against the defendant's confession of criminal facts, the total amount of damage is not more than 1.79,00 won, and it is recognized that the defendant agreed with the victims, but there is a history of punishment once suspended sentence and seven times of fine for the same kind of crime, such as the crime of this case, the act of taking money against many and unspecified persons under the pretext of sale of the Internet goods, such as the crime of this case, is serious in the nature of the crime that disturbs the Internet commercial transactions and promotes the uncertainty of transactions, and the court below has determined the punishment by taking into account the circumstances favorable to the defendant, and there is no change of circumstances that can be considered in sentencing after the decision of the court below was made, and other various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, the defendant's assertion is not reasonable because it is too unreasonable

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.