난민불인정처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of disposition;
A. On November 24, 2013, the Plaintiff, a foreigner of Austrian nationality, entered the Republic of Korea as a short-term commercial (C-3, 30 days) visa, and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on December 13, 2013.
B. On November 13, 2014, the Defendant issued a notification of refugee status refusal (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that it does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear, which is a requirement for refugee status, under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.
C. The Plaintiff appealed and filed an objection with the Minister of Justice, but the said application was dismissed on September 24, 2015.
【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap Nos. 1 and 2, Eul No. 1 and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff was a parasianian male born in the Egyptian South Korea, and had been employed as a bus driver on February 2012, 201 as a parasianian employee by moving to the Nananan Northern Northern People to a bus driver on or around August 15, 2013. On or around August 15, 2013, Bo mutual aid officers of Bobane, a terrorist organization, committed a terrorist act against Mosians, such as bombing off many cities nearby the Republic of Korea, bomboming off to the government offices and churches, and bombing to the Masia North Eastdong, which was located in the Egyptian metropolitan region, but the plaintiff escaped from this region, one of the representative grounds for Bobane, and thus, it is unlawful in this case’s status without recognizing any other refugee status under the premise that there is a sufficient fear that it might be homicide, a terrorist organization.
(b) Entry in the attached Form of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;
C. Determinations are recognized as being based on the overall purport of the pleadings in each entry in the evidence Nos. 1 to 3 as follows.