Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be paid.

The Defendant is a business director of Company D located on the sixth floor of Songpa-gu Seoul building C from around December 10, 1999 to March 31, 201, and a person who worked as the representative director of Company E located in the same place from March 18, 2005 to March 31, 201, and Company D and E entered into an agency contract with F and distributed Company D and E after being supplied with Eelcom from F.

From January 2008 to March 31, 201, the Defendant received from FOEM (the method of manufacturing an original trademark attachment) producer of FOEM (the method of manufacturing an original trademark attachment) of FF Co., Ltd. in the above office from G, the manufacturing company, the Korean Intellectual Property Office, “FC” registered with the Korean Intellectual Property Office, “FC” (the total purchase amount of KRW 5,061,528,810, the total purchase amount of KRW 5,061,528,810) and sold it to the business partners such as I, thereby infringing the FF’s trademark right.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Legal statement of the witness J;

1. A written accusation;

1. Tax invoice, and details of trademark registration;

1. A criminal investigation report (report on attaching a trademark photograph) (F and G's trademark photograph);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (abusing evidentiary data on the current purchase ofG);

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and Articles of 93 (Selection of Fine)

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;