When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Around 08:10 on March 3, 2012, the Defendant: (a) went on a taxi for business use in the vicinity of the new town located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and (b) did not have the intent or ability to pay the taxi fee to the victim C; (c) provided that “I would pay the taxi fee of KRW 2.50,000 to the Jung-gu, Daejeon; (d) if I would pay the taxi fee, I would like to have the victim pay the taxi fee to the victim; and (e) on the same day, I would like to have the victim pay the taxi fee of KRW 12:40 on the same day; and (e) would not have paid the taxi fee of KRW 2.50,000 on the ground that I

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of writing C;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014).

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;