When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 24, 2017, around 10:00, the Defendant re-exploited the costs due to the noise problems between the victim E (42 tax, female) and the upper floor residing in the same necked route of the “D convenience store” in the Namyang-si, Namyang-si.

Accordingly, the Defendant, with both hands, was sleeped of the victim's head collection, and was injured in need of two weeks of treatment on the part of the father and chest, and on the part of the fluoral base of the fluoral base of the fluoral base of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A report on the occurrence of a crime, on-site photographs, and a written statement and a medical certificate prepared in E;

1. References to inquiries, such as criminal history, and application of statutes;

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts that the defendant's act constitutes a legitimate defense since the victim first exercised violence at the time of the instant case, and the defendant's act constitutes a legitimate defense.

살피건대, 이 법원이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들을 종합하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정들, 즉 ① 피해자는 수사기관에서 “ 우연히 피해자를 만나게 되었는데 예전에 싸웠던 일로 다시 시비가 되었고, 피고인이 피해자의 머리채를 잡아끌면서 누르고, 발로 배를 1회 찼다” 라는 취지로 진술하였던 점, ② 피고인도 수사기관에서 “ 피해자와 말다툼을 하던 중 피해자가 달려들며 손으로 잡기에 오른 손으로 머리채를 잡고 누르고, 오른 발로 배를 1회 밀었다” 라는 취지로 진술하였던 점, ③ 당시 상황을 목격하고 경찰에 신고한 F은 수사기관에서 “ 피고인이 발로 차 피해자를 넘어뜨렸고, 피해자는 피고인을 폭행한 사실이 없다” 라는 취지로 진술하였던 점, ④ 피고인의 위 행위로 인해 당시...