When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On April 5, 2016, the Defendant carried out one green fluor equivalent to KRW 59,000, which is displayed at the victim’s market price where the victim’s surveillance was neglected in the E clothes store in Gangseo-si (Seoul) around 15:55 on April 5, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

2. The Defendant, at around 16:45 on the same day, carried one yellow fluor equivalent to KRW 59,00 in the market price owned by the said victim by the said method at the places described in paragraph 1.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A photograph of a CCTV image to be cut;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (related to recovery of damaged articles and correction of prices);

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines under Article 329 of the Criminal Act for the crime (see, e.g., the crime during the period of repeated crime of the same type, the agreement with the victim, the value of damaged goods is not high, and the mental and medical treatment for the symptoms of the wall to military register is being provided);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;