beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.01.14 2019가단5057660

양수금

Text

1. The defendant is either 169,089,682 won and its importance within the scope of property inherited from the network D to the plaintiff succeeding intervenor.

Reasons

1. Indication of claims: The description of "the grounds for the modified claims" is as shown in the attached Form.

2. The judgment on deeming confession [Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act, the Defendant did not dispute the existence or scope of the claim against the Plaintiff (ex officio)’s net D, and only the defense of the qualified acceptance (Seoul Family Court Decision 2010 Hu7640), but the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff accepted the Defendant’s defense and modified the purport of the claim]