beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.10.24 2017고정817

채권의공정한추심에관한법률위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant received an amount of KRW 2 million from the creditor C, and in return, had the defendant D's father-victim E to urge the change.

No one shall commit any act which seriously undermines privacy or peace in business by coercing any debtor or his/her related person to prepare a repayment fund by borrowing money or in any other similar way to arouse fear or apprehension.

On August 5, 2016, the Defendant sent the victim a photo of the borrowed name D through Kakao Stockholm, a social relationship network service, and then sent it to the victim on August 6, 2016.

T. T. B. T. T. B. T. L. T. T. T. T.

“.......” and “....., today’s length,” is required to do so.

To the contrary, a plan to continue to fall and to find in the house is essential;

“I,” and around August 7, 2016, I will see the Preferred Sheet at any time in the event of any promise.

The phrase “the victim sent the word “,” and sent the pictures to put the recipient’s ticket to demand debt reimbursement on the vehicle.

On September 13, 2015, at around 17:50, the Defendant continuously posted a banner stating that “D from Seoul H used a loan certificate and borrowed 260 million won and annual interest rate of 29.9 million won at the front glass of his/her vehicle in the parking lot in the south-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, G Council member, which was located in F at Jeju,” “D and father G Council member, shall perform his/her duty of repayment.”

Accordingly, the defendant forced the victim to repay his debt to cause uneasiness, thereby seriously impairing the peace of privacy.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to E and D;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes on site photographs and Kakaoo photographs;

1. Article 15 (2) 2 of the Act on the Fair Debt Collection Practices and Article 15 (2) 5 of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 15 of the same Act and Article 9 of the same Act and the selection of fines;

1. The defendant's grounds for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, and the victim's defendant are against the defendant.