제3자이의
1. All appeals filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) against the instant principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be the principal lawsuit.
1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows: (a) the court's conclusion of the judgment of the court of first instance is to cancel the transfer contract of July 25, 2012 concerning the claim to refund the lease deposit of the instant restaurant (Seoul High Court 2014Na2047519, Dec. 3, 2015) and the transfer contract of July 26, 2012 concerning the right to lease deposit of the instant restaurant (Seoul High Court 2014Na2047519, Jul. 21, 2012), and (b) C has been sentenced to a judgment of July 28, 200 and its delay damages to the Defendant, and (c) it is to accept the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the main sentence of Articles 20 and 420 of the Civil Procedure Act with the exception of adding "No. 7 evidence" to "No. 3, 214 and No. 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance."
2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of the principal lawsuit is justified, and the defendant's claim of the counterclaim is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and all appeals against the principal lawsuit and counterclaim of this case are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.