beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.07.26 2018고단3485

위증

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant received correspondence from E to the effect that the actual operator of B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant company”) is C (U.S. name D) and E is merely a person who works in accordance with C’s instructions, and had a mind that the Defendant tried to make a false statement as he did not know about E.

On October 25, 2011, the Defendant appeared in the court of Seoul Western District Court No. 303 located in Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-dong 105-1, Mapo-gu, Seoul, and took an oath as a witness of the above court's violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement) E (Embezzlement).

The defendant stated that "I see who is the Chairperson of (State) F" as "I know to D," and "I see that I am to the question "I am to the point of view that I will act on behalf of the Governor of the (State) F", and "I am to the question of "I am to the question of "I am to the point of view that I would act on behalf of the Governor", and "I am to the question of "I am to the question of "I am to the point of view that I would actually manage B at that time", and "I am to the question of "I am to the question of "I am to the point of view that I will act on more than two occasions at the time of entering into a contract with D (Korean) who is a permanent resident of the Republic of Korea)", and I am to the question of "I am to the actual operation of the Fund in accordance with the direction of C and I am to the question of "I am to participate only in the management of the company."

However, at the time, the Defendant was an actual operator in charge of personnel affairs, accounting, and management by acquiring the instant company by directly and directly, not the agent of C, and there was no consultation with C on the process of acceptance by changing only a simple person in telephone communications with C, and C is a company of this case and its subsidiary.