성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(특수준강간)등
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.
However, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive, each.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower judgment is too unreasonable to impose the sentence (for the Defendants, two years and six months of imprisonment, orders to complete sexual assault treatment programs 40 hours, and confiscation against Defendant A) of the lower judgment.
2. The crime of this case, which committed the crime of this case, was committed by the Defendants, by taking advantage of the fact that the victims, who drinking alcohol together, frightened, boomed the victims in a state of resistance under the influence of alcohol, and caused the victims to feel a sense of sexual humiliation by taking the face of the crime, and the nature of the crime is very poor.
In particular, in the course of committing the crime, the flusing of the Defendants, such as serious insult of the victims in the course of committing the crime, is containing a secret image in a way that is difficult to put the victims into a vehicle or horse, and such circumstances should be taken into consideration.
However, the Defendants are relatively old who became adults, and there is no record of criminal punishment, and the Defendants are detained for seven months due to the instant crime, and they seem to reflect their mistakes in depth and repent.
The parents of the Defendants expressed that the court below made considerable damages to the victims, and based on this, the victims expressed their intention not to want criminal punishment against the Defendants.
나 아가 피해자는 당 심에 이르러 피고인들의 부모님으로부터 적지 않은 수준의 추가 적인 피해 배상을 받고, 피고인들에 대하여 ‘ 비록 피고인들의 죄가 밉고 피해자 없었던 때로 돌아갈 수는 없지만, 그래도 피해자 역시 부모님을 모시고 있는지라 아들들을 생각하는 피고인들의 부모님 마음 만큼은 이해가 됩니다.
Even if the parents of the Defendants think about their parents, they release the fatherdi Defendants and move to the opposite time.
“In addition, the Defendants actively wanted the Defendants’ wife.”
Considering the above circumstances, the Defendants are against the Defendants.