However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2015. 6. 27. 13:35경 전남 완도군 C에 있는 완도경찰서 D파출소에서 순경 E에게 “F 형님이 뭘 잘못해서 교도소를 보냈냐 나도 따라 갈란다. 따라 갈라면 내가 너 때리면 교도소에 갈 수 있냐 너 이리 와라!“라고 말하고, 이에 E이 귀가할 것을 권유하였음에도 약 20분간 소란을 피운 뒤 계속하여 위 파출소 출입문 밖에서 “다 가만히 두지 않겠다.”라고 말을 하며 위 파출소 계단 밑 화단에서 가져온 30cm 돌멩이를 파출소 건물을 향해 던지고 계속해서 10cm 돌맹이를 출입문을 향하여 던져 공무집행방해 현행범으로 체포된 뒤 수갑을 차고 있던 중 손목통증을 호소하여 경찰관이 수갑을 풀어주자 이를 기회 삼아 순경 E에게 몸을 들이대며 “가만히 안두겠다. 교도소 들어갔다가 며칠 살다가 나온다.”라고 협박하면서 머리로 순경 E의 안면부위를 1회 들이받았다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and G;

1. Investigation report (Attachment by a suspect of a stone with a stone attached to the wall or the entrance and exit of a Do box and a log for service of a Do box);

1. A photograph with a stone stone and a CCTV-cap photograph;

1. Application of CCTV video Acts and subordinate statutes to the police box;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of type] of the obstruction of the performance of official duties (the obstruction of the performance of official duties and the coercion of official duties) (the decision of the recommended area] and the basic area (the decision of the recommended area between June and April);

2. The instant crime of this case by a sentence is committed by a police officer, disregarding the public power of the Defendant.