1. Examining the records of the accused case in light of the relevant legal principles, the court below is just to order the accused and the person requesting the attachment order (hereinafter “defendant”) to disclose personal information for ten years (However, the notification order is limited to the facts constituting the crime of paragraphs 2 and 3 of the decision of the court below), and there is no error of law as otherwise alleged in the grounds of appeal.

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the records, it is justifiable for the lower court to have determined that the Defendant was at risk of repeating a crime and ordered the Defendant to attach an electronic tracking device for 15 years, and there is no error of law by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the risk of repeating a crime.

3. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.