However, as to the Defendants, each of the above two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Defendant A, who is engaged in self-business with the trade name of “C”, “B”, and “B”, “B” and “B” did not intervene in the employment of others for profit or gain profits as an intermediary, despite having known the fact that D’s children who were known to the general public were unable to find employment, the Defendant had attempted to arrange the employment thereof and receive the price thereof.

On December 28, 2015, the Defendant met the instant D with B, at the teahouse on the preceding and preceding E’s trade name, and B, “in Korea, it is well known to G with the general affairs of F viewing General affairs and G. It is possible to find us as a inorganic contract occupation on the F viewing Water System, and up to now, she would allow 10 million won to work from January 19, 2016 if she would enter the F viewing Water System,” and the Defendant called “B to have two female employees employed before pre-service,” and received 10 million won check from the said D, along with a request for her employment.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with B to intervene in the employment of others for profit.

On December 25, 2016, Defendant A 1 arranged that I would be able to enter into a new subcontract for the construction of a multi-family house located in K with the J around December 25, 2016. On January 2017, J requested the victim to change the design and made the victim to increase the construction cost of KRW 20 million and paid to I. Thus, Defendant A 20 million in advance to B.

However, there was no fact that the defendant requested the J to change the design, or the J applied for the increase in the subcontract price of KRW 20 million.

Nevertheless, on January 25, 2017, the Defendant deceivings the victim as such, and its deceivings KRW 10 million from the victim’s account (N) which is the Defendant’s seat.