2. The judgment of the court below seems to be reasonable in full view of the following factors: (a) even though the defendant was found to have committed a crime in response to mistake while committing a crime; and (b) the defendant agreed with the victim F, the victims of the crime of this case and most victims have not recovered from damage; (c) the defendant had the record of receiving juvenile protective disposition due to the crime of larceny; (d) the defendant committed a larceny crime of 4 and 5 as stated in the judgment of the court below during the suspended execution period without being sentenced to a suspended sentence for special larceny; and (e) the defendant’s age, character and conduct, occupation and environment, background and consequence of the crime; and (e) the circumstances after the crime.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.