If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On September 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 03:35, on the front day of Mapo-gu Seoul, “A man’s portion is under influence of alcohol”; (b) was about to return to the police officer D, a police officer D, and E, a police officer of the Mapo Police Station C District of Mapo-gu, Seoul, a police officer called out after receiving 112 a report, after soliciting him to return to the police officer F by shouldering him; and (c) on the said D and E, the Defendant “I see a person who was under the influence of alcohol at a low level.”

The term "booming a high trial expense, taking a bath, preventing the front thereof, preventing him/her from standing, and assaulting the chest part of the above D and E in both hands once, respectively.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a selective fine (the initial crime, circumstances of crimes, etc.);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;