(Provided, “creditor” is “Plaintiff” and “debtor” is “Defendant”. 2. Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3) and (1) of the Civil Procedure Act applicable mutatis mutandis provisions of the Acts only submitted a written objection to the payment order without stating the original copy of the payment order and the substantial grounds for disputing the Plaintiff’s claim, and only submitted a written objection against the payment order without submitting a written response, and thus, the Plaintiff did not appear on the date for pleading without submitting a subsequent written response. Therefore, all of the Plaintiff’s allegations are deemed to have been led to confession.