손해배상등
1. The Defendant: (a) from October 5, 2016, the Plaintiff 15,871,8880 won to Plaintiff A, and the Plaintiff B, C, and D respectively; and (b) from October 5, 2016.
1. The following facts of recognition do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged by taking into account the whole purport of the pleadings as a whole in the statements in Gap evidence 1-1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 5-1 to 4, 5-6, 7-1, 2, 8, 9-1 to 5.
The Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F. F. 167.9 square meters (road name address, Mapo-gu, Seoul) and the ground brick and mentment mentbrob roof 2 residential and neighborhood living facilities 81.75 square meters on each floor, 81.75 square meters on two floors, and 10.88 square meters on each underground room (hereinafter “instant building”) were owned by H. On November 13, 2012, the ownership transfer registration was filed for inheritance due to inheritance by agreement division as of May 13, 2015.
The building of this case was approved on August 1, 1978, and the first underground floor was used as a house, the first floor was used as a house and a neighborhood living facility, and the second floor was used for a house and a store, respectively.
B. The Defendant, who is engaged in real estate construction business, has been awarded a contract with the Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (JJJ 1,668.10 square meters of land adjacent to the south-dong area of the instant housing (hereinafter “instant construction”) for construction works to newly build the two-story underground, the seven-story apartment and the one-Dong 46 households of residential facilities on the ground (hereinafter “instant construction works”) and conducted a ground survey on the prospective construction site around May 2014, and conducted a field survey on the instant building on August 6, 2015 (K stock company) from around August 10, 2015 to around August 6, 2015.
9. From October 8, 2015 to November 29, 2015, the CIP A and the TIP TM were conducted for the removal of existing buildings until 30.
C. The plaintiffs (the husband of the plaintiff Eul representing the plaintiffs as the non-party L, who is the plaintiff's fraud, representing the plaintiffs; hereinafter for convenience, the plaintiff's building of this case has been made to the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office around November 2015.